In a new study, published in The Journal of Psychology on June 11, a team at the National Institute of Mental Health and Charles University showed volunteers 25 different animal images to gauge their fear and disgust.
Spiders were the clear winner (cats, side note, were at the extreme opposite end of the scale). The team, led by Jakub Polák, surveyed 2,291 volunteers from a Facebook group comprised of Czech and Slovakian volunteers to better understand animal phobias. They grouped the images in five clusters:
- • Non-slimy invertebrates
- • Snakes
- • Mice, rats, and bats
- • Human endo- and exoparasties
- • Farm/pet animals
Fear is immediately recognizable in the bigger species that could, if given the opportunity, easily maim and kill us: crocodiles, bears, lions, tigers, snakes. More intriguing are creepy-crawlies that are more likely to murder us with venomous bites and scratches, such as parasites and snakes, or infect us with a plague, such as rats and mice. These latter groups invoke an even deeper fear in us. Respondents showed that while fear of an attack from large game is warranted, critters closer to our everyday reality trigger mortal anxiety: infectious pathogens are more realistic than a bear attack. They write, "It is thus disgust, rather than fear, that is the primordial negative emotion involved in aversion to animals, particularly the smaller ones." Disgust is not limited to insects. Our olfactory sense is primed for it as well. Scrunching our noses at the scent of spoiled milk or rotten food, another harbinger of pathogens, remains an important avoidance technique for sickness. Yet there's something even more primal about diseases that crawl. ("Maggots, Michael, you're eating maggots. How do they taste?") The researchers discovered that the fear of predatory mammals does not spur disgust, while snakes, spiders, and parasites evoke both emotions.
No comments:
Post a Comment